Everyone has their own management style and each style might excel given the environment and situation. From my own observations and exercises flexing my mini-management muscles recently, I have come to prefer a style that combines (1) forwardly divergent thinking that finds intersections between ideas that is then (2) powered by on-the-ground action. A style that constantly makes active connections between lapses in communication and concepts (inherent to the nature of this world), as opposed to passive strategizing... An inspirational leader who not only galvanizes others to action but also unhesitatingly draws her sword to join her comrades in battle and potential bloodshed. She does so out of a sense of duty to guard and expand on territories established by others before her yet also does so for a personal substantive cause. When the war is over, she will not rest on her laurels, but will continue to build and unify her grounds.
"Territories established by others before her" - Yes, at this point in time (and for a long while now), I prefer building within a semi-established environment, to throw curve balls if they might apply and to let the system work if it does. For a rebel without a core structure to react against is not a true rebel but is a mere actor -- As our reality works in relatives. This might change in the future, but we shall see!